this, sadly, from michelle malkin , reiterating the "official statement" on seymour hersh's expose of american special forces activities in iraq. please. i guess you accept "offical statements" at face value? where you live, woman? even malkin has to realize that invading iran would be a beyond-belief bad idea. but i also would admit this: the reasons to do so are infinitely more convicing than in the case of iraq, and the only serious reasons not to are...practical. let me say this - as i have again and again - one of the important justifications for cheney of the invasion of iraq was that saddam did not have any wmd's: that is, there would be no serious resistance. this, because the bush admin - despite the belligerent attitude - is essentially almost as chickenshit as someone like kerry. obviously, an even better, a much better case, can be made with regard to north korea. however, if we actually cared about anything we purport to, we'd have invaded the sudan some time ago.