michelle malkin, reporterette and others are ridiculing both scott ritter and al-jazeera for his contribution to it. this seems a bit much. i guess that they are pissed off because they were oh so wrong about iraq every which way and scott ritter was right. so anyway, maybe the idea is that reporting things accurately is tantamount to treason. al-jazeera has been more accurate on civilian casualties, american abuse of prisoners, and many other stories than many american news outlets, to say nothing of the official spokesliars of the dod etc. the deeply sad fact is that as a matter of fact, as "treason" is defined by these vicious chumps, the truth is indeed treason.