multiples

so, i'd be interested to see what you think of going to a multi-author format. i started with crusader mike because, for one thing, he doesn't have a blog. plus i think there's an interesting overlap/contrast in our approaches. but i would think about adding more as time goes on. the drawback as i see it is that it's cool to have a single voice etc. but then again, it's cool not to. as a practical matter it turns out that while i like blogging, i am not one of these insane machines who can blog all day every day. there are big temporal holes, then a flurry. so of course multiple authors make things more consistent. anyway, thoughts.