i really think the impulse to roll all the bushy scandals into one big bale of indictment, as frank rich does today, is unfortunate. like i say, i'm enjoying watching the clowns go down. but the only connection of l'affaire wolfowitz to iraq is that wolfowitz was an architect of the iraq policy. do you think dems are less likely to get into a "i got my girlfriend a job"-type scandals than republicans? or kerik love-nest/friend-in-the-mafia type stuff? connecting gonzales on us attorneys to iraq relies likewise on the flimsiest analogies, etc. what you don't want to do is become such a partisan hack yourself that you're just obviously willing to throw in anything and call it all iraq. at that point you've got no claim to objectivity or credibility.