i think it's an interesting question who is more dangerous, more brutal, more embroiled in an incomprehensible, monstrous ideology: al qaeda? or dc party crashers? and we must, following the security breeches, or at any rate short skirts, ask who will keep us - specifically me - safe from party girls? whomever will keep me safe has my vote, and anything else is unacceptable. actually existing party girls have literally driven me insane and non-literally killed me, or at any rate made me see that life is empty, purposeless, and wrong. we must poteck the president from a set of values emptier than the absolute void of meaningless total annihilation.

one good thing about party girls: even if they wore underwear, or on the other hand anything other than underwear, there would be no room for explosives in their underwear, beneath their skintight transparent clothes, or underwear as the case may be. and yet ten minutes of listening to them talk as they gulp mojitos and snort lines makes becoming a suicide bomber and setting your package on fire seem like a rational alternative. in other words, i suggest that there may be a direct connection between michaela salahi and the crotch bomber. probably, like everyone else, he met her at a party.