more extreme violence, at least rhetorically: tonight chris matthews characterized "these people's rhetoric" as "dangerous," then put up in illustration a sarah palin soundbite, in which she said of the obama administration that "it's all alinsky all the time." so that's past your limit? it's wacky or just wack to think that's dangerous or hint that it's going beyond what's protected by the first amendment because it's an incitement to violence or something. (what does "dangerous" mean here?) "it's like she's saying 'trotsky,' like she's saying obama is not an american." really? because it doesn't seem like that to me. or even if it was "like" that, it's not what she actually said. was it racist? so how come you keep saying it is? how come these people can't take a free-wheeling debate or endure a rhetorical flourish? it's frigging pathetic.