paul v krugman! 'Krugman, meanwhile, described Paul as "living in the world that was 150 years ago."' the idea that some people live in the past and others live in the future is one of the most bizarre artifacts of 'progressivism.' and then, it's bad to live in the past, and good to live in the future, i suppose. but before we defended this wacky claim, we'd have to make sense of the whole wacky physics in which you can pick a year or an epoch and live in it. while many people moved on to may this morning, i stayed behind in april. i feel so retarded. krugman, of course, comes back to us twice a week from 2525, where - like will smith or tom cruise - he walks a post-apocalyptic cgi wasteland or an ecstatic totalitarian cgi paradise: hard to tell really cause it's now and you can't see krugman from here.