a few more nasty cracks about hillary. first of all, do not become confused as between her political gifts and her husband's. right? he is an extraordinary politician with a common touch. she is, at her best, pretty good. but one thing she has in common with her husband: she is in the clinton marriage. i would say we are being entertained by versions of the clinton marriage right now on scandal and house of cards. now, obviously a union of convenience between monsters of ambition is pretty entertaining. but looking squarely at the grants or the underwoods, i don't think most people would actually want to be governed by them. now there's why no one's ever going to see her private emails.
bill is gifted, but he's unbelievably gross. i do remember hillary in 1992 as bimbos erupted everywhere: 'i'm not some tammy wynette stand by your man dolt staying home baking cookies'. but tammy divorced george jones at least twice, while hillary was cuckolded hundreds of times and stood there and took it and defended her husband. how feminist is that? how strong? how right?
here's one of the many things that could bring the whole disgusting operation to a screeching halt: jeffrey epstein. another approach i'd take if i were on oppo research: try to construct schedules for bill clinton and dominique strauss-kahn over the last twenty years and see where they coincide. when were they in davos together or dubai or whatever and who has the pics? what guys like this should teach you is why men want power (oh, it's to do public service and give back) and what they do with it once they get it. go ahead if you are rational and draw anarchist conclusions, please.
