blobjectivity

in response to the nytimes piece, people - both in the comments and in my email - assume that i'm promoting a return to objective truth, or that i'm all about science, etc: like i'm just reviving exploded enlightenment stuff or just wanting to go back. they can be forgiven for that, because it is really hard to envision alternatives. but this is not where i want to go at all. here is a slice of entanglements: a system of philosophy which gives a sketch of the approach.